you're reading:
Movie Reviews

Movie review: ‘Contagion’

Steven Soderbergh sends sales of Purell and facemasks through the roof with ‘Contagion’.

Cool rationale over tired melodrama and methodical storytelling as opposed to cheap set pieces are the key factors in Steven Soderbergh’s docudrama-thriller Contagion, a disturbingly realistic movie about a relentless viral outbreak that may do for sales of hand sanitizer and surgical masks what anthrax did for duct tape and plastic sheeting in the early 2000s.

The movie opens with an executive (Gwyneth Paltrow) returning home from a business trip to Hong Kong, complaining of jetlag. She’s dead within three days, patient zero in an outbreak of a swiftly and thoroughly lethal virus of unknown origin that quickly goes global. Scientists race the clock to find a vaccine, authorities try in vain to manage the inevitable panic, and ordinary citizens struggle to survive the disease as well as a degree of social breakdown.
Much as he did with Traffic, Soderbergh deftly intertwines numerous threads involving a broad cross-section of characters. Matt Damon stars as Paltrow’s husband, who must take care of his daughter and find a degree of normalcy amidst the chaos and fear; Marion Cotillard and Kate Winslet are doctors in the field for the WHO and CDC, respectively; and Laurence Fishburne as a beleaguered CDC administrator. Also featured are small but appreciable performances by John Hawkes, Bryan Cranston, Jennifer Ehle, Elliott Gould, and others.

Among the cast, Jude Law’s character, a sleazy, self-serving wannabe journalist who fashions himself as a public crusader while milking the situation for his own personal gain, runs against the grain. As a commentary on the on the chaotic influence and questionable reliability of the blogosphere (“blogging is just graffiti with punctuation” says a flustered researcher at one point), he almost seems out of place given the premise; but, the questions he raises about ethics and maintaining a free and open society while managing a large-scale catastrophe sobering.

Soderbergh, who has mentioned retiring but hopefully will not make good on the threat, maintains a detached, unembellished, procedural feel. He also takes pains to build a specialized form of terror in the audience, illustrating the innocuous ways a disease can spread so casually that germophobes will lose sleep for weeks.

On the down side, its brisk 105-minute plot means Contagion moves too fast at times, and its large cast — though interconnected — gives us a lot of plot threads to keep up with. Some of the characters go underdeveloped and their fates don’t always fully resonate with us. Cotillard in particular is underused, as her character’s story arc is a bit anemic and ultimately feels incomplete.

The unglamorous nature of the production, may turn of viewers expecting another Outbreak or The Stand without the Stephen King-ness. If it does, they’ll be missing out on an unnervingly plausible cautionary tale that seems all but inevitable.

Advertisements

About Gary Dowell

Professional film critic, journalist, Byronic hero.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Movie review: ‘Side Effects’ « movie ink™ - February 6, 2013

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Go to:

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,514 other followers

%d bloggers like this: